Re: [Lguest] [PATCH RFC/RFB] x86_64, i386: interrupt dispatch changes

[Avi Kivity]

Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ...
>   
> > Once it's done there's no reason not to commit it.  But the effort expended
> > to do it is gone, without any measurable return.
> >
> >     
> ...
>
> Not sure Avi what you mean but as far as I know Alexander is working on
> this file so he need just time to finish (we all have other duties you know :).
> So I think the idea Peter proposed could be merged right after Alexander
> will have finished. At least the Peter's suggestion was recorded in this
> thread which means it will *not* be lost eventually. Or you meant something
> else (yep, I could have it translated plain wrong)?
>   

What I mean is that hpa's patch makes the kernel better, so it should be 
applied.  I'm not sure what else Alexander is working on, but I do hope 
the improvements will be more concrete.

(Alexander, I apologise for being so discouraging; but I really feel 
these improvements are marginal)

--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/