Re: [PATCH 1/3] tracing/ftrace: don't insert TRACE_PRINT duringselftests

From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Thu Dec 04 2008 - 17:56:15 EST



On Thu, 4 Dec 2008, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Impact: fix tracer selfstests false results
>
> After setting a ftrace_printk somewhere in th kernel, I saw the
> Function tracer selftest failing.
>
> When a selftest occurs, the ring buffer is lurked to see if
> some entries were inserted. But concurrent insertion such as
> ftrace_printk could occured at the same time and could give
> false positive or negative results.
>
> This patch prevent prevent from TRACE_PRINT entries insertion
> during selftests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
> 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> index ea38652..5dca6ef 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> @@ -44,6 +44,14 @@
> unsigned long __read_mostly tracing_max_latency = (cycle_t)ULONG_MAX;
> unsigned long __read_mostly tracing_thresh;
>
> +/* We need to change this state when a selftest is running.
> + * A selftest will lurk into the ring-buffer to count the
> + * entries inserted during the selftest although some concurrent
> + * insertions into the ring-buffer such as ftrace_printk could occurred
> + * at the same time, giving false positive or negative results.
> + */

The comment style should be:

/*
* comment
* comment
* comment
*/


> +static atomic_t tracing_selftest_running = ATOMIC_INIT(0);

Do we need that is atomic? Also, it needs to be __read_mostly.

> +
> /* For tracers that don't implement custom flags */
> static struct tracer_opt dummy_tracer_opt[] = {
> { }
> @@ -589,6 +597,8 @@ int register_tracer(struct tracer *type)
> struct tracer *saved_tracer = current_trace;
> struct trace_array *tr = &global_trace;
> int i;
> +
> + atomic_set(&tracing_selftest_running, 1);

Enable this in the mutex lock, and we could make it a normal int.

> /*
> * Run a selftest on this tracer.
> * Here we reset the trace buffer, and set the current
> @@ -603,6 +613,7 @@ int register_tracer(struct tracer *type)
> /* the test is responsible for initializing and enabling */
> pr_info("Testing tracer %s: ", type->name);
> ret = type->selftest(type, tr);
> + atomic_set(&tracing_selftest_running, 0);
> /* the test is responsible for resetting too */
> current_trace = saved_tracer;
> if (ret) {
> @@ -3594,7 +3605,7 @@ int trace_vprintk(unsigned long ip, int depth, const char *fmt, va_list args)
> unsigned long flags, irq_flags;
> int cpu, len = 0, size, pc;
>
> - if (tracing_disabled)
> + if (tracing_disabled || atomic_read(&tracing_selftest_running))
> return 0;
>
> pc = preempt_count();
> --

-- Steve

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/