Re: [PATCH] Fix incorrect use of loose in migrate.c

[Nick Piggin]

On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 02:08:07PM +1100, Nick Andrew wrote:
> Fix incorrect use of loose in migrate.c
> 
> It should be 'lose', not 'loose'.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nick Andrew <nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
>  mm/migrate.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
> index 1e0d6b2..7605b2b 100644
> --- a/mm/migrate.c
> +++ b/mm/migrate.c
> @@ -514,7 +514,7 @@ static int writeout(struct address_space *mapping, struct page *page)
>  	/*
>  	 * A dirty page may imply that the underlying filesystem has
>  	 * the page on some queue. So the page must be clean for
> -	 * migration. Writeout may mean we loose the lock and the
> +	 * migration. Writeout may mean we lose the lock and the
>  	 * page state is no longer what we checked for earlier.
>  	 * At this point we know that the migration attempt cannot
>  	 * be successful.

I don't know... presumably we haven't just gone and lost the little
bugger. I mean, we were holding it one minute, then... gone?  Do we
have Alzheimer's? Unlikely. I think we loosed it.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/