Re: [PATCH 7/7] regulator: PCF50633 pmic driver

From: Balaji Rao
Date: Mon Dec 15 2008 - 09:05:21 EST


On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 11:35:49AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 04:34:00PM +0530, Balaji Rao wrote:
>
> > +struct regulator_ops pcf50633_regulator_ops = {
> > + .set_voltage = pcf50633_regulator_set_voltage,
> > + .get_voltage = pcf50633_regulator_get_voltage,
> > + .enable = pcf50633_regulator_enable,
> > + .disable = pcf50633_regulator_disable,
> > + .is_enabled = pcf50633_regulator_is_enabled,
> > + .set_suspend_enable = pcf50633_regulator_enable,
> > + .set_suspend_disable = pcf50633_regulator_disable,
> > +};
>
> Are you sure that the suspend variants of the operations should be the
> same as the regular versions?
>

Yes, basically the chip doesn't change state during suspend/resume.
We just enable or disable them the usual way.

> > +struct platform_driver pcf50633_regulator_driver = {
> > + .driver = {
> > + .name = "pcf50633-regltr",
> > + },
> > + .probe = pcf50633_regulator_probe,
> > + .remove = __devexit_p(pcf50633_regulator_remove),
> > +};
>
> Not that it matters too much but I have a hard time liking "regltr".

Ha! The name pcf50633-regulator exceeds 20 chars and there is no space
remaining for the ".0" or ".1" at the end. This gave me a sysfs warning
and so I changed it.

- Balaji
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/