Re: [RFC v11][PATCH 04/13] x86 support for checkpoint/restart

From: Oren Laadan
Date: Wed Dec 17 2008 - 10:25:28 EST




Mike Waychison wrote:
> Oren Laadan wrote:
>> Add logic to save and restore architecture specific state, including
>> thread-specific state, CPU registers and FPU state.
>>
>> In addition, architecture capabilities are saved in an architecure
>> specific extension of the header (cr_hdr_head_arch); Currently this
>> includes only FPU capabilities.
>>
>> Currently only x86-32 is supported. Compiling on x86-64 will trigger
>> an explicit error.
>>

[...]

>> +
>> + hh->gdt_entry_tls_entries = GDT_ENTRY_TLS_ENTRIES;
>> + hh->sizeof_tls_array = sizeof(thread->tls_array);
>> + hh->ntls = ntls;
>> +
>> + ret = cr_write_obj(ctx, &h, hh);
>> + cr_hbuf_put(ctx, sizeof(*hh));
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + cr_debug("ntls %d\n", ntls);
>> + if (ntls == 0)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + /* for simplicity dump the entire array, cherry-pick upon restart */
>> + ret = cr_kwrite(ctx, thread->tls_array, sizeof(thread->tls_array));
>
> Again, the the TLS descriptors in the GDT should be called out an not
> tied to the in-kernel representation.

True. I'll add a 'FIXME' comment.

However, I'm yet to see a case where this breaks among x86_32, and I'm no
expert in that area to tell whether it could. (Moving from x86_32 to x86_64
is another story, and will require some compatibility layer anyway).

>
>> +
>> + /* IGNORE RESTART BLOCKS FOR NOW ... */

[...]

>> +static int cr_write_cpu_fpu(struct cr_ctx *ctx, struct task_struct *t)
>> +{
>> + void *xstate_buf = cr_hbuf_get(ctx, xstate_size);
>> +
>> + /* i387 + MMU + SSE logic */
>> + preempt_disable(); /* needed it (t == current) */
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * normally, no need to unlazy_fpu(), since TS_USEDFPU flag
>> + * have been cleared when task was context-switched out...
>> + * except if we are in process context, in which case we do
>> + */
>> + if (t == current && (task_thread_info(t)->status & TS_USEDFPU))
>> + unlazy_fpu(current);
>> +
>> + memcpy(xstate_buf, t->thread.xstate, xstate_size);
>
> This is probably better off being very deliberate about what registers
> we are dumping from a traceability and compatibility point of view?

Same here.

>
>> + preempt_enable(); /* needed it (t == current) */
>> +
>> + return cr_kwrite(ctx, xstate_buf, xstate_size);
>
> Missed cr_huf_put()

Ooops ... will fix.

>
>> +}
>> +
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_X86_64 */

[...]

>> + /*
>> + * restore TLS by hand: why convert to struct user_desc if
>> + * sys_set_thread_entry() will convert it back ?
>> + */
>> +
>> + size = sizeof(*desc) * GDT_ENTRY_TLS_ENTRIES;
>> + desc = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!desc)
>
> cr_hbuf_put() here.

Will fix.

>
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + ret = cr_kread(ctx, desc, size);
>> + if (ret >= 0) {
>
> if (ret == 0)

Right.

>
>> + /*
>> + * FIX: add sanity checks (eg. that values makes
>> + * sense, that we don't overwrite old values, etc
>> + */
>> + cpu = get_cpu();
>> + memcpy(thread->tls_array, desc, size);
>> + load_TLS(thread, cpu);
>> + put_cpu();
>> + }
>> + kfree(desc);
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = 0;
>> + out:
>> + cr_hbuf_put(ctx, sizeof(*hh));
>> + return ret;
>> +}

[...]

Thanks for the review !

Oren.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/