Re: [RFC v11][PATCH 05/13] Dump memory address space

From: Dave Hansen
Date: Thu Dec 18 2008 - 10:54:59 EST


On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 06:10 -0500, Oren Laadan wrote:
> >> + for (i = pgarr->nr_used; i--; /**/)
> >> + page_cache_release(pgarr->pages[i]);
> >
> > This is sorta hard to read (and non-intuitive). Is it easier to do:
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < pgarr->nr_used; i++)
> > page_cache_release(pgarr->pages[i]);
> >
> > It shouldn't matter what order you release the pages in..
>
> Was meant to avoid a dereference to 'pgarr->nr_used' in the comparison.
> (though I doubt if the performance impact is at all visible)

That's a bit to aggressive an optimization. You two piqued my
curiosity, so I tried a little experiment with this .c file:

extern void bar(int i);

struct s {
int *array;
int size;
};

extern struct s *s;
void foo(void)
{
int i;
#ifdef OREN
for (i = s->size; i--; )
#else
for (i = 0; i < s->size; i++)
#endif
bar(s->array[i]);
}

for O in "" -O -O1 -O2 -O3 -Os; do
gcc -DOREN $O -c f1.c -o oren.o;
gcc $O -c f1.c -o mike.o;
echo -n Oren:; objdump -d oren.o | grep ret;
echo -n Mike:; objdump -d mike.o | grep ret;
done

Smaller numbers are better, and indicate the size of that function,
basically:

Oren: 38: c3 ret
Mike: 3b: c3 ret
Oren: 44: c3 ret
Mike: 36: c3 ret
Oren: 44: c3 ret
Mike: 36: c3 ret
Oren: 43: c3 ret
Mike: 34: c3 ret
Oren: 43: c3 ret
Mike: 34: c3 ret
Oren: 3a: c3 ret
Mike: 2a: c3 ret

gcc version 4.2.4 (Ubuntu 4.2.4-1ubuntu3). In all but the unoptimized
case, Mike's version wins. Readability, and icache footprint all in one
package!

-- Dave

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/