Re: [Bug #12156] v2.6.28-rc2: x86_32 relocation regression?

[H. Peter Anvin]

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> not really a regression but a long-standing inconvenience/bug of the debug 
> symbols of relocatable kernels. (ever since relocatable kernels were added 
> in '06 or so.) Nevertheless we queued up a revert of the defconfig change 
> for .29, to not expose it in the defconfig:
> 
>  f269b07: x86: revert CONFIG_RELOCATABLE=y defconfig change
> 
> so i think it can be taken off the regressions list.
> 

It's a bug, yes, not a regression.  It should be fixed if possible, but
it's not a regression nor a hideously critical issue.

	-hpa


-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/