Re: [PATCH] failslab for SLUB

From: Johannes Weiner
Date: Tue Dec 23 2008 - 10:22:40 EST


On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 04:44:26PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hi Hannes,
>
> On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 15:43 +0100, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > > static inline void *____cache_alloc(struct kmem_cache *cachep,
> > gfp_t flags)
> > > {
> > > void *objp;
> > > @@ -3381,7 +3316,7 @@ __cache_alloc_node(struct kmem_cache *cachep, gfp_t flags, int nodeid,
> > > unsigned long save_flags;
> > > void *ptr;
> > >
> > > - if (should_failslab(cachep, flags))
> > > + if (slab_should_failslab(cachep, flags))
> >
> > should_failslab()?
>
> No, look at what slab_should_failslab() does. We need to exclude
> cache_cache in SLAB but not in SLUB.

Ah, crap. I missed that small '+' and thought it had been dropped.

Sorry, Pekka.

Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/