Christoph Hellwig escribió:On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 10:26:37AM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
On Friday 02 of January 2009, Rob Landley wrote:
Before 2.6.25 (specifically git bdc807871d58285737d50dc6163d0feb72cb0dc2 )And now bash is going to be required... while some distros don't need/have
building a Linux kernel never required perl to be installed on the build
system. (Various development and debugging scripts were written in perl
and python and such, but they weren't involved in actually building a
kernel.) Building a kernel before 2.6.25 could be done with a minimal
system built from gcc, binutils, bash, make, busybox, uClibc, and the Linux
kernel, and nothing else.
bash. /bin/sh should be enough.
*nod* bash is in many ways a worse requirement than perl. strict posix
/bin/sh + awk + sed would be nicest, but if that's too much work perl
seems reasonable.
well, bash is not worse as bash is trivial to cross-compile to run on a
constrained sandbox and perl is a nightmare, but I agree bash should be
avoided too.
I think the $(( ... )) bash-ism can be replaced with a simple .c helper toy.
Thank Rob for reopening the topic.
Alejandro Mery