[PATCH] ia64: cpumask fix for is_affinity_mask_valid()

[Ingo Molnar]

* Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> * Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Saturday 03 January 2009 07:08:40 Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >  - architectures that have no __fls (8 out of 21) fail to build:
> > > 
> > >      arch/cris
> > >      arch/frv
> > >      arch/h8300
> > >      arch/m32r
> > >      arch/m68k
> > >      arch/mn10300
> > >      arch/xtensa
> > 
> > Fixes pushed, m68k should be OK tho; is this actual compile test?  You have
> > to look in include/asm-m68k to see __fls.
> 
> yeah, i stopped the tests after the first two build failures - the rest is 
> a grep result from arch/*/, that's why include/asm-m68k/ was left out.
> 
> > > Rusty, would it be fine with you if we did all the remaining bits via 
> > > tip/cpus4096? It's your tree and your bits and we wanted to send our 
> > > remaining bits after your tree went to Linus but the conflict 
> > > resolutions from Mike are valuable so i think we should reconsider the 
> > > ordering.
> > 
> > Yeah, no reason for us to do the merge twice.  As long as it ends 
> > upstream, I'm a happy camper.
> 
> great - lets do it that way then. I have pulled your fixes into the 
> cpus4096 tree:
> 
>  5ece5c5: xtensa: define __fls
>  5c134da: mn10300: define __fls
>  16a2062: m32r: define __fls
>  9ddabc2: h8300: define __fls
>  ee38e51: frv: define __fls
>  0999769: cris: define __fls

ok, these architectures build fine now.

There's one new build failure due to cpumask changes: ia64. I have fixed 
it via the patch below. (if it looks good to you i'll carry it via 
tip/cpus4096, ok?)

Breakage came via this commit i think:

 d036e67: cpumask: convert kernel/irq

[ia64 is the only architecture that re-defines default_affinity_write().]

	Ingo

----------------------->