Re: [PATCH 2/2] ieee1934: dv1394 interrupt enabling/disabling brokenon big-endian

From: Stefan Richter
Date: Sun Jan 04 2009 - 16:04:09 EST


Bill Fink wrote:
> Although I admit to being mystified how it works both
> before and after the patch, since the cpu_to_le32() calls that were
> added should result in byte swapping on PPC that wasn't being done
> before. I guess that either the code paths involved aren't actually
> being triggered by my xine DV viewing, or there's some fortuitous
> palindromic setting of bits.

I agree. If I had more spare time for these things I would try to find
out what's really going on. But since the patch really looks like the
right thing to do and doesn't regress, I will send it in without further
investigation.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--= ---= --=--
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/