Re: [PATCH v7 0/8] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n

From: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
Date: Tue Jan 06 2009 - 09:52:15 EST


* Mike Galbraith <efault@xxxxxx> [2009-01-05 05:40:16]:

> On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 08:50 +0530, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan wrote:
> > When CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG is enabled, the sched domain tree is dumped
> > (dmesg)
>
> Oh, that. I'm dense <thwack>
>
> [ 0.476050] CPU0 attaching sched-domain:
> [ 0.476052] domain 0: span 0-1 level MC
> [ 0.476054] groups: 0 1
> [ 0.476057] domain 1: span 0-3 level CPU
> [ 0.476058] groups: 0-1 2-3
> [ 0.476062] CPU1 attaching sched-domain:
> [ 0.476064] domain 0: span 0-1 level MC
> [ 0.476065] groups: 1 0
> [ 0.476067] domain 1: span 0-3 level CPU
> [ 0.476069] groups: 0-1 2-3
> [ 0.476072] CPU2 attaching sched-domain:
> [ 0.476073] domain 0: span 2-3 level MC
> [ 0.476075] groups: 2 3
> [ 0.476077] domain 1: span 0-3 level CPU
> [ 0.476078] groups: 2-3 0-1
> [ 0.476081] CPU3 attaching sched-domain:
> [ 0.476083] domain 0: span 2-3 level MC
> [ 0.476084] groups: 3 2
> [ 0.476086] domain 1: span 0-3 level CPU
> [ 0.476088] groups: 2-3 0-1

Hi Mike,

This seems to be correct for the configuration. Hope this would be
same for shced_mc=1 and sched_mc=2 since you would have hacked
mc_capable.

By default, all 4 cores will be 1 group at CPU at sched_mc={1,2} so
that packages are clearly identified in the CPU level sched groups.


> 2.6.26.8
> [ 0.524043] CPU0 attaching sched-domain:
> [ 0.524045] domain 0: span 0-1
> [ 0.524046] groups: 0 1
> [ 0.524049] domain 1: span 0-3
> [ 0.524051] groups: 0-1 2-3
> [ 0.524054] CPU1 attaching sched-domain:
> [ 0.524055] domain 0: span 0-1
> [ 0.524056] groups: 1 0
> [ 0.524059] domain 1: span 0-3
> [ 0.524060] groups: 0-1 2-3
> [ 0.524063] CPU2 attaching sched-domain:
> [ 0.524064] domain 0: span 2-3
> [ 0.524065] groups: 2 3
> [ 0.524068] domain 1: span 0-3
> [ 0.524069] groups: 2-3 0-1
> [ 0.524072] CPU3 attaching sched-domain:
> [ 0.524073] domain 0: span 2-3
> [ 0.524075] groups: 3 2
> [ 0.524077] domain 1: span 0-3
> [ 0.524078] groups: 2-3 0-1
>
> > I was actually asking about software threads specified in the sysbench
> > benchmark. Your have run almost 256 clients on a 4 core box, does
> > that mean sysbench had 256 worker threads?
>
> Yes.

Let me try similar experiments on my dual socket quad core system.
I was limiting the threads to 8 assuming that the system will max-out
by then.

Thanks for the updates.

--Vaidy

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/