Re: 2.6.29 -mm merge plans

From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Tue Jan 06 2009 - 18:25:00 EST


On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 03:13:44PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> (cc added)
>
> On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 17:57:44 -0500
> Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 12:43:00AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > > softirq-introduce-statistics-for-softirq.patch
> > > proc-export-statistics-for-softirq-to-proc.patch
> > > proc-update-document-for-proc-softirqs-and-proc-stat.patch
> >
> > Why is this in procfs?
>
> softirq stuff in /proc seems appropriate? It's alongside
> /proc/interrupts. We could put it in /trendy-fs-of-the-day, but what
> would it gain us?

debugfs seems to be the normal thing for these.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/