Re: [PATCH -v5][RFC]: mutex: implement adaptive spinning

From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Wed Jan 07 2009 - 18:33:33 EST




On Wed, 7 Jan 2009, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> What would be interesting is various benchmarks against all three.
>
> 1) no mutex spinning.
> 2) get_task_struct() implementation.
> 3) spin_or_sched implementation.

One of the issues is that I cannot convince myself that (2) is even
necessarily correct. At least not without having all cases happen inder
the mutex spinlock - which they don't. Even with the original patch, the
uncontended cases set and cleared the owner field outside the lock.

Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/