Re: [fix] Too async libata breakage

From: Justin P. Mattock
Date: Thu Jan 08 2009 - 16:23:32 EST


Arjan van de Ven wrote:
Additional async_synchronize_full() helps and box boot to the end.

Hi Linus,

can you add the patch below to your tree? This makes the
async_synchronize_full() a real absolute async barrier, rather than
just synchronizing the work scheduled upto the starting point.
It's a bit too much for some cases (so later on I might introduce the
softer synchronization again) but it solves some real problems
for people so this should go into -rc1 please...

>From ca1827b142e41b54c612026b3c0b5d239f21a715 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 12:35:11 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] async: make async_synchronize_full() more serializing

turns out that there are real problems with allowing async
tasks that are scheduled from async tasks to run after
the async_synchronize_full() returns.

This patch makes the _full more strict and a complete
synchronization. Later I might need to add back a lighter
form of synchronization for other uses.. but not right now.

Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/async.c | 4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/async.c b/kernel/async.c
index 9737338..64cc916 100644
--- a/kernel/async.c
+++ b/kernel/async.c
@@ -206,7 +206,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(async_schedule_special);
void async_synchronize_full(void)
{
- async_synchronize_cookie(next_cookie);
+ do {
+ async_synchronize_cookie(next_cookie);
+ } while (!list_empty(&async_running) || !list_empty(&async_pending));
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(async_synchronize_full);
I'm getting this as well,
happens three to two times in a row,
then I'll get a good bootup.
going to try and see if I can grab a log
with ohci1394

regards;

Justin P. Mattock

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/