Re: [RFC][PATCH] NOOP cgroup subsystem

[Paul Menage]

On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 9:32 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
<kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Motivation: Simply classify Applications by cgroup
>  When using cgroup for classifying applications, some kind of "control" or
>  "account" subsys must be used. For flexible use of cgroup's nature of
>  classifying applications, NOOP is useful. It can be used regardless of
>  resource accounting unit or name spaces or some controls.
>  IOW, NOOP cgroup allows users to tie PIDs with some nickname.

I agree that the idea is useful. But to me it seems to a bit
artificial that you still have to mount some kind of subsystem purely
to get the grouping, and that you can only have one such grouping.

I think I'd prefer the ability to mount a cgroups hierarchy without
*any* subsystems (maybe with "-o none"?) which would give you a
similar effect, but without you needing to know about a special no-op
subsystem, and would allow you to have multiple "no-op" groupings.

Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/