Re: linux-next: Tree for January 8 (percpu)

[Rusty Russell]

On Friday 09 January 2009 08:53:22 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> (Forward to Rusty)
> 
> On Thu, 08 Jan 2009 09:23:55 -0800 Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > Changes since 20090107:
> > > 
> > > Undropped tree:
> > > 	rr
> > > 
> > > Dropped trees (temporarily):
> > > 	ocfs2 (build problem)
> > > 	cpu_alloc (build problem)
> > 
> > 
> > When CONFIG_SMP=n, both arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h and
> > include/asm-generic/percpu.h define both of
> > read_percpu_ptr() and read_percpu_var().

Erk... this header is a bit of a mess of 64bit/32bit UP/SMP defines.

I've thwacked it harder, thanks!
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/