Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure

From: Michael Ellerman
Date: Mon Jan 12 2009 - 04:50:20 EST


On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 10:05 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 10:48 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi Linus,
> > >
> > > Today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> > >
> > > arch/powerpc/platforms/pasemi/cpufreq.c: In function 'pas_cpufreq_cpu_init':
> > > arch/powerpc/platforms/pasemi/cpufreq.c:216: error: incompatible types in assignment
> > > arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/cpufreq_64.c: In function 'g5_cpufreq_cpu_init':
> > > arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/cpufreq_64.c:365: error: incompatible types in assignment
> > > arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/cbe_cpufreq.c: In function 'cbe_cpufreq_cpu_init':
> > > arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/cbe_cpufreq.c:121: error: incompatible types in assignment
> > >
> > > Caused by commit 835481d9bcd65720b473db6b38746a74a3964218 ("cpumask:
> > > convert struct cpufreq_policy to cpumask_var_t") which missed updating
> > > all the powerpc (at least) cpufreq drivers.
> >
> > Yeah, it only updates x86 it seems ...
>
> Yeah - and that build bug was stupid too - when touching a generic file
> that is called include/linux/cpufreq.h and changing a key data field one
> should at minimum get the idea that it's generic for a reason and should
> start grepping the tree ...
>
> It slipped through because it didnt get caught in build tests because
> cpufreq isnt enabled in the powerpc defconfig.

Which defconfig?

powerpc(master) $ git grep CPU_FREQ=y arch/powerpc/configs/ppc64_defconfig
arch/powerpc/configs/ppc64_defconfig:CONFIG_CPU_FREQ=y

cheers

--
Michael Ellerman
OzLabs, IBM Australia Development Lab

wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au
phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183)

We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors,
we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part