[PATCH -tip] time-sched.c: tick_nohz_update_jiffies should bestatic

[Jaswinder Singh Rajput]

Impact: cleanup, reduce kernel size a bit, avoid sparse warning

Fixes sparse warning:
 kernel/time/tick-sched.c:137:6: warning: symbol 'tick_nohz_update_jiffies' was not declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/time/tick-sched.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
index 1b6c05b..d3f1ef4 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ __setup("nohz=", setup_tick_nohz);
  * value. We do this unconditionally on any cpu, as we don't know whether the
  * cpu, which has the update task assigned is in a long sleep.
  */
-void tick_nohz_update_jiffies(void)
+static void tick_nohz_update_jiffies(void)
 {
 	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
 	struct tick_sched *ts = &per_cpu(tick_cpu_sched, cpu);
-- 
1.6.0.6



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/