Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] sched: de CPP-ify the scheduler code

[Gregory Haskins]

Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> On Wed, 14 Jan 2009, Gregory Haskins wrote:
>
>   
>>  
>> -#define enqueue_pushable_task(rq, p) do { } while (0)
>> -#define dequeue_pushable_task(rq, p) do { } while (0)
>> +static inline
>> +void enqueue_pushable_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) {}
>> +static inline
>> +void dequeue_pushable_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) {}
>>     
>
> Wouldn't the above look better as:
>
> static inline void
> enqueue_pushable_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> {
> }
> static inline void
> dequeue_pushable_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> {
> }
>
>   
I personally like to try to keep disabled functions ideally as close to
one line as possible to visually denote that it isn't doing anything
worth looking at.  But I don't feel strongly either way, so whatever
makes you guys happy. :)

Shall I convert the others to this form as well?

-Greg

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature