Re: [GIT PULL] adaptive spinning mutexes

[Ingo Molnar]

* Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:51:22 +0100
> Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > * Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > > > Do people enable CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG?
> > > > 
> > > > If they suspect performance problems and want to analyze them?
> > > 
> > > The vast majority of users do not and usually cannot compile their own 
> > > kernels.
> > 
> > ... which they derive from distro kernels or some old .config they always 
> > used, via 'make oldconfig'. You are arguing against well-established facts 
> > here.
> > 
> > If you dont believe my word for it, here's an analysis of all kernel 
> > configs posted to lkml in the past 8 months:
> > 
> >    $ grep ^CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG linux-kernel | wc -l
> >    424
> > 
> >    $ grep 'CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG is not' linux-kernel | wc -l
> >    109
> > 
> > i.e. CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG=y is set in 80% of the configs. A large majority 
> > of testers has it enabled and /sys/debug/sched_features was always a good 
> > mechanism that we used for runtime toggles.
> 
> You just disproved your own case :(

how so? 80% is not enough? I also checked Fedora and it has SCHED_DEBUG=y 
in its kernel rpms.

note that there's also a performance issue here: we generally _dont want_ 
a debug sysctl overhead in the mutex code or in any fastpath for that 
matter. So making it depend on SCHED_DEBUG is useful.

sched_feat() features get optimized out at build time when SCHED_DEBUG is 
disabled. So it gives us the best of two worlds: the utility of sysctls in 
the SCHED_DEBUG=y, and they get compiled out in the !SCHED_DEBUG case.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/