Re: [PATCH 0/4] cgroup/memcg : updates related to CSS

[KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki]

On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:21:16 +0530
Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> * KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2009-01-15 19:21:20]:
> 
> > 
> > I'm sorry that I couldn't work so much, this week.
> > No much updates but I think all comments I got are applied.
> > 
> > About memcg part, I'll wait for that all Nishimura's fixes go ahead.
> > If cgroup part looks good, please Ack. I added CC to Andrew Morton for that part.
> > 
> > changes from previous series
> >   - dropeed a fix to OOM KILL   (will reschedule)
> >   - dropped a fix to -EBUSY     (will reschedule)
> >   - added css_is_populated()
> >   - added hierarchy_stat patch
> > 
> > Known my homework is
> >   - resize_limit should return -EBUSY. (Li Zefan reported.)
> > 
> > Andrew, I'll CC: you [1/4] and [2/4]. But no explicit Acked-by yet to any patches.
> >
> 
> Kamezawa-San, like you've suggested earlier, I think it is important
> to split up the fixes from the development patches. I wonder if we
> should start marking all patches with BUGFIX for bug fixes, so that we
> can prioritize those first.
>  
Ah yes. I'll do that from next post. 

patch [1/4] and [2/4] doesnt modify memcg at all. So, I added Andrew to CC.
It's a new feature for cgroup.

for memcg part. of course, I'll wait for all Nishimura's fixes goes to -rc.

patch [3/4] will remove most of them, crazy maze of hierarchical reclaim.
patch [4/4] is written for demonstration. but the output seems atractive.

Thanks,
-Kame

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/