Re: [patch 2.6.29-rc] regulator: add get_status()

[Mark Brown]

")
Fcc: +sent-mail

On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:03:17PM -0800, David Brownell wrote:

>  * Define a new regulator driver get_status() method, which is the
>    first method reporting regulator outputs instead of inputs.
>    It can report on/off and error status; or instead of simply
>    "on", report the actual operating mode.

> For the moment, this is a sysfs-only interface, not accessible to 
> regulator clients.  Such clients can use the current notification
> interfaces to detect errors, if the regulator reports them.

It's useful for bootstrapping purposes - the notifiers will only report
changes.  Not that this is something that should happen on a regular
basis so I'd be surprised if there were much demand.

> Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

but...

> +enum regulator_status {
> +	REGULATOR_STATUS_OFF,
> +	REGULATOR_STATUS_ON,
> +	REGULATOR_STATUS_ERROR,
> +	/* fast/normal/idle/standby are flavors of "on" */
> +	REGULATOR_STATUS_FAST,
> +	REGULATOR_STATUS_NORMAL,
> +	REGULATOR_STATUS_IDLE,
> +	REGULATOR_STATUS_STANDBY,
> +};
> +

> +	/* report regulator status ... most other accessors report
> +	 * control inputs, this reports results of combining inputs
> +	 * from Linux (and other sources) with the actual load.
> +	 */
> +	int (*get_status)(struct regulator_dev *);
> +

...this needs kerneldoc adding.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/