Re: [RFC] per-CPU cryptd thread implementation based on workqueue

From: Herbert Xu
Date: Thu Jan 15 2009 - 22:31:26 EST


On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 11:10:36AM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
>
> The scalability of current cryptd implementation is not good. So a
> per-CPU cryptd kthread implementation is necessary. The per-CPU kthread
> pool implementation need to consider many issues such as CPU hotplug, so
> I suggest to base cryptd kthread implementation on workqueue, that is,
> create a dedicate workqueue for crypto subsystem. This way, chainiv can
> use this crypto workqueue too.

Yes that sounds like a great idea.

> I will implement it if you have no plan to do it yourself.

Please do.

Thanks,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/