Re: [patch 27/85] [PATCH 07/44] [CVE-2009-0029] System callwrapper infrastructure

[Heiko Carstens]

On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 09:44:59AM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Am Donnerstag 15 Januar 2009 schrieb Jiri Slaby:
> > On 01/15/2009 10:59 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > > +
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_SYSCALL_WRAPPERS
> > > +
> > > +#define SYSCALL_DEFINE(name) static inline long SYSC_##name
> > > +#define SYSCALL_DEFINEx(x, name, ...)                                        
> \
> > > +     asmlinkage long sys_##name(__SC_DECL##x(__VA_ARGS__));          \
> > > +     static inline long SYSC_##name(__SC_DECL##x(__VA_ARGS__));      \
> > 
> > Hmm, we don't support at least gcc 3.4.6 anymore :/. It seems to be the same 
> as in:
> 
> I see two possible quick fixes:
> -funit-at-a-time will allow these inline constructs (tested with 3.4.6 on i386 
> with enabled syscall wrappers. x86_64 already sets this flag)

If that helps: care to send a patch that enables this?
Dependent on CONFIG_HAVE_SYSCALL_WRAPPERS?

That is, if this is really a problem.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/