Re: [PATCH 2/3] drivers/gpu/drm: fix sparse warnings: unexport symbols

From: Hannes Eder
Date: Sun Jan 18 2009 - 11:04:56 EST


On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Jaswinder Singh Rajput
<jaswinder@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-01-18 at 16:28 +0100, Hannes Eder wrote:
>> Fix this sparse warnings:
>>
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_helper.c:137:6: warning: symbol 'drm_helper_probe_connector_modes' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c:360:6: warning: symbol 'drm_mode_validate_clocks' was not declared. Should it be static?
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hannes Eder <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_helper.c | 6 +++---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c | 7 +++----
>> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_helper.c
>> index d8a982b..a0b2601 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_helper.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_helper.c
>> @@ -134,8 +134,9 @@ void drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes(struct drm_connector *connector,
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes);
>>
>> -void drm_helper_probe_connector_modes(struct drm_device *dev, uint32_t maxX,
>> - uint32_t maxY)
>> +static void drm_helper_probe_connector_modes(struct drm_device *dev,
>> + uint32_t maxX,
>> + uint32_t maxY)
>> {
>> struct drm_connector *connector;
>>
>> @@ -143,7 +144,6 @@ void drm_helper_probe_connector_modes(struct drm_device *dev, uint32_t maxX,
>> drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes(connector, maxX, maxY);
>> }
>> }
>> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_helper_probe_connector_modes);
>>
>
> hmm, what you are trying to do ?
>
>>
>> /**
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
>> index 7c36f16..c0cfe39 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
>> @@ -357,9 +357,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_mode_validate_size);
>> * sure each mode falls within a given range (defined by @min and @max
>> * arrays) and sets @mode->status as needed.
>> */
>> -void drm_mode_validate_clocks(struct drm_device *dev,
>> - struct list_head *mode_list,
>> - int *min, int *max, int n_ranges)
>> +static void drm_mode_validate_clocks(struct drm_device *dev,
>> + struct list_head *mode_list,
>> + int *min, int *max, int n_ranges)
>> {
>> struct drm_display_mode *mode;
>> int i;
>> @@ -376,7 +376,6 @@ void drm_mode_validate_clocks(struct drm_device *dev,
>> mode->status = MODE_CLOCK_RANGE;
>> }
>> }
>> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_mode_validate_clocks);
>
> ??

In both cases: a grep over the entire kernel tree shows that the
function is only used within the compilation unit it is defined,
therefore make it static and un-EXPORT it.

Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/