Re: [Ecryptfs-devel] [PATCH] ecryptfs: some inode attrs, and a question

[hooanon05]

Dave Kleikamp:
> > > For a regular file, the size of the upper inode is not the same as the
> > > size of the lower inode.  The lower inode includes the header blocks
> > > which are not visible in the upper inode.  So ecryptfs_interpose() will
> > > overwrite the correct upper inode size.
	:::
> It's restoring i_size to the correct value after ecryptfs_interpose
> updates it with the wrong value.

Does "ecryptfs_interpose() will overwrite the correct upper inode size"
means ecryptfs_interpose() sets a wrong value?
If so, I can understand why ecryptfs_link() sets i_size.


J. R. Okajima
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/