Re: kernel BUG at fs/ext/super.c:428

From: Pallipadi, Venkatesh
Date: Wed Jan 21 2009 - 15:13:40 EST


On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 13:20 -0800, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 08:29:37PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > 38d47c1b7075bd7ec3881141bb3629da58f88dab is first bad commit
> > > commit 38d47c1b7075bd7ec3881141bb3629da58f88dab
> > > Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Date: Fri Sep 26 19:32:20 2008 +0200
> > >
> > > futex: rely on get_user_pages() for shared futexes
> > >
> > > On the way of getting rid of the mmap_sem requirement for shared futexes,
> > > start by relying on get_user_pages().
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Acked-by: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
> > >
> > However does a futex change make ext3 crap its pants?
>
> I agree, this doesn't make much sense. I've looked at the patch, and
> I don't see how this would cause an ext3 orphaned-inode list handling
> problem
>
> Are you sure the bisect was done correctly? Have you tried reverting
> that one commit, or otherwise conclusively shown that a kernel with
> this commit fails, and one without this commit works just fine?
>

Unfortunately, I cannot revert this patch alone from upstream git.
But I consistently see
upstream git: Always produces this oops on reboot
checkout of ï38d47c1b: Always produces this oops on reboot
checkout of ïï94aca1da (one patch before the above commit): Reboots fine
without the oops.

This is petty specific to the particular userspace, looks like.
I only see this on SLES10 installation. Also, I need a non-root user
logged in at least once after boot through X to see this problem. I was
always seeing this as I had autologin on local terminal and was remotely
rebooting the system. If I just boot to init 3 or boot to init 5 with no
user logged in or boot to init 5 with root logged in, I do not see this
problem.

Thanks,
Venki

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/