Re: kernel BUG at fs/ext/super.c:428

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 08:39 -0800, Darren Hart wrote:

> > diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
> > index f89d373..f4132ab 100644
> > --- a/kernel/futex.c
> > +++ b/kernel/futex.c
> > @@ -929,7 +929,7 @@ out_unlock:
> > 
> >  	/* drop_futex_key_refs() must be called outside the spinlocks. */
> >  	while (--drop_count >= 0)
> > -		drop_futex_key_refs(&key1);
> > +		drop_futex_key_refs(&key2);
> 
> Unfortunately, I realized later that this code was indeed correct and I 
> asked Ingo to pull my patch implementing the above change.  Quoting my 
> previous mail on the subject:
> 
> "I believe what is happening here is that the requeue loop requeues each 
> waiter from one futex (key1) to another (key2).  It rightly takes a 
> reference to the futex at key2 and then decrements the references to 
> key1 by drop_count (since the waiters now reference key2, not key1). 
> The newly taken key2 references will be dropped in futex_wait() when 
> each waiter is woken up and takes the futex."

Argh, that wants a comment..

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/