[PATCH 16/21] lockdep: fully reduce mark_lock_irq()

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Wed Jan 28 2009 - 09:01:22 EST


Now what its only two functions, they again look rather similar.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/lockdep.c | 86 +++++--------------------------------------------------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/kernel/lockdep.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/lockdep.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/lockdep.c
@@ -2061,13 +2061,13 @@ typedef int (*check_usage_f)(struct task
enum lock_usage_bit bit, const char *name);

static int
-mark_lock_irq_write(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
- int new_bit)
+mark_lock_irq(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this, int new_bit)
{
const char *name = state_name(new_bit);
const char *rname = state_rname(new_bit);

int excl_bit = exclusive_bit(new_bit);
+ int read = new_bit & 1;
int dir = new_bit & 2;

check_usage_f usage = dir ?
@@ -2075,57 +2075,17 @@ mark_lock_irq_write(struct task_struct *

if (!valid_state(curr, this, new_bit, excl_bit))
return 0;
- if (!valid_state(curr, this, new_bit, excl_bit + 1))
- return 0;

- /*
- * just marked it hardirq-safe, check that this lock
- * took no hardirq-unsafe lock in the past:
- */
- if (!usage(curr, this, excl_bit, name))
- return 0;
-#if STRICT_READ_CHECKS
- /*
- * just marked it hardirq-safe, check that this lock
- * took no hardirq-unsafe-read lock in the past:
- */
- if (!usage(curr, this, excl_bit + 1, rname))
+ if (!read && !valid_state(curr, this, new_bit, excl_bit + 1))
return 0;
-#endif
- if (state_verbose(new_bit, hlock_class(this)))
- return 2;

- return 1;
-}
-
-static int
-mark_lock_irq_read(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
- int new_bit)
-{
- const char *name = state_name(new_bit);
- const char *rname = state_rname(new_bit);
-
- int excl_bit = exclusive_bit(new_bit);
- int dir = new_bit & 2;
-
- if (!valid_state(curr, this, new_bit, excl_bit))
+ if ((!read || (!dir || STRICT_READ_CHECKS)) &&
+ !usage(curr, this, excl_bit, name))
return 0;

- if (!dir) {
- /*
- * just marked it hardirq-read-safe, check that this lock
- * took no hardirq-unsafe lock in the past:
- */
- if (!check_usage_forwards(curr, this, excl_bit, name))
- return 0;
- } else if (STRICT_READ_CHECKS) {
- /*
- * just marked it hardirq-read-unsafe, check that no
- * hardirq-safe lock in the system ever took it in the past:
- */
- if (!check_usage_backwards(curr, this, excl_bit, name))
- return 0;
- }
+ if ((!read && STRICT_READ_CHECKS) &&
+ !usage(curr, this, excl_bit + 1, rname))
+ return 0;

if (state_verbose(new_bit, hlock_class(this)))
return 2;
@@ -2133,36 +2093,6 @@ mark_lock_irq_read(struct task_struct *c
return 1;
}

-static int mark_lock_irq(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
- enum lock_usage_bit new_bit)
-{
- int ret = 1;
-
- switch(new_bit) {
- case LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ:
- case LOCK_USED_IN_SOFTIRQ:
- case LOCK_USED_IN_RECLAIM_FS:
- case LOCK_ENABLED_HARDIRQ:
- case LOCK_ENABLED_SOFTIRQ:
- case LOCK_ENABLED_RECLAIM_FS:
- return mark_lock_irq_write(curr, this, new_bit);
-
- case LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ_READ:
- case LOCK_USED_IN_SOFTIRQ_READ:
- case LOCK_USED_IN_RECLAIM_FS_READ:
- case LOCK_ENABLED_HARDIRQ_READ:
- case LOCK_ENABLED_SOFTIRQ_READ:
- case LOCK_ENABLED_RECLAIM_FS_READ:
- return mark_lock_irq_read(curr, this, new_bit);
-
- default:
- WARN_ON(1);
- break;
- }
-
- return ret;
-}
-
enum mark_type {
#define LOCKDEP_STATE(__STATE) __STATE,
#include "lockdep_states.h"

--

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/