Re: PFs on pages pinned with get_user_pages()
From: Frank Mehnert
Date: Thu Jan 29 2009 - 11:04:21 EST
On Thursday 29 January 2009, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > That aside, is there any reason you have to avoid scheduling? Otherwise
> > > I would just allow so and be done with it.
> >
> > The reason is that our code expects that to ensure syncing of the CPU
> > state with the saved state. I fear it is quite difficult to change
> > that...
>
> Ah, is that what KVM uses the preempt notifiers for? Could you too?
Right, that could be an option.
We will try to change our code which is a big effort as we try
to keep the code as unique as possible between the different
hosts we support (Linux, Solaris, Windows, Mac OS X).
Just to be sure: There is no other option than disabling interrupts
or calling disable_preemption() to prevent scheduling?
Kind regards,
Frank
--
Dr.-Ing. Frank Mehnert Sun Microsystems http://www.sun.com/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.