Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: Support active high IRQs on WM835x

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Mon Feb 02 2009 - 16:57:29 EST


On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 19:23:18 +0000
Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/wm8350-core.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
> include/linux/mfd/wm8350/core.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/wm8350-core.c b/drivers/mfd/wm8350-core.c
> index e5e82c7..908284c 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/wm8350-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/wm8350-core.c
> @@ -1423,7 +1423,21 @@ int wm8350_device_init(struct wm8350 *wm8350, int irq,
> mutex_init(&wm8350->irq_mutex);
> INIT_WORK(&wm8350->irq_work, wm8350_irq_worker);
> if (irq) {
> - ret = request_irq(irq, wm8350_irq, 0,
> + int flags = 0;
> +
> + if (pdata && pdata->irq_high) {
> + flags |= IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH;
> +
> + wm8350_set_bits(wm8350, WM8350_SYSTEM_CONTROL_1,
> + WM8350_IRQ_POL);
> + } else {
> + flags |= IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW;
> +
> + wm8350_clear_bits(wm8350, WM8350_SYSTEM_CONTROL_1,
> + WM8350_IRQ_POL);
> + }
> +
> + ret = request_irq(irq, wm8350_irq, flags,
> "wm8350", wm8350);
> if (ret != 0) {
> dev_err(wm8350->dev, "Failed to request IRQ: %d\n",

This conflicts a bit with your earlier
mfd-initialise-wm8350-interrupts-earlier.patch.

I had marked mfd-initialise-wm8350-interrupts-earlier.patch as
needed-in-2.6.29 so I reworked this patch to fit.

afacit we haven't heard from Sam in a couple of weeks. If he's having
a bit of downtime I guess I'll merge

mfd-initialise-wm8350-interrupts-earlier.patch
mfd-mark-wm835x-usb_slv_500ma-bit-as-accessible.patch
mfd-pcf50633-terminate-i2c_device_id-list.patch

myself. But I'll leave that a week or two yet.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/