Re: [patch] SLQB slab allocator (try 2)

From: Christoph Lameter
Date: Wed Feb 04 2009 - 10:55:47 EST


On Tue, 3 Feb 2009, Nick Piggin wrote:

> > Just to clarify on this last point, do you mean slub_max_order=0 to
> > force order-0 allocations in SLUB?
>
> Hmm... I think slub_min_objects=1 should also do basically the same.
> Actually slub_min_object=1 and slub_max_order=1 should get closest I
> think.

slub_max_order=0 would be sufficient.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/