Re: [PATCH] OMAP: MMC: recover from transfer failures - Resend

From: Paul Walmsley
Date: Thu Feb 05 2009 - 15:32:23 EST


On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Andrew Morton wrote:

> On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 15:05:58 +0100
> Jean Pihet <jpihet@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > + while (OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base,
> > + SYSCTL) & SRD)
> > + ;
>
> Is a __raw_readl() sufficient to prevent the cpu from burning up here,
> or should we add cpu_relax()?

The __raw_readl() should be sufficient. The MMC controller is located on
the L4 CORE interconnect, so the round trip latency for the read from MMC
is at least 90 ns, while the CPU cycle time is only about 1 to 2 ns.

> An infinite loop which assumes the hardware is perfect is always a
> worry. But I see the driver already does that, so we're no worse off..


- Paul

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/