Re: [PATCH] usb: musb: tweak musb_read_fifo() to avoid unusedwarnings

From: Felipe Balbi
Date: Fri Feb 06 2009 - 14:26:52 EST


On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 02:24:27PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 14:15, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 06:22:16PM +0800, Bryan Wu wrote:
> >> From: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > I'd like to get a patch body here.
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <cooloney@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/usb/musb/blackfin.c | 9 +++++----
> >> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/blackfin.c b/drivers/usb/musb/blackfin.c
> >> index 7861348..0ebb19d 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/usb/musb/blackfin.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/usb/musb/blackfin.c
> >> @@ -54,13 +54,11 @@ void musb_write_fifo(struct musb_hw_ep *hw_ep, u16 len, const u8 *src)
> >> void musb_read_fifo(struct musb_hw_ep *hw_ep, u16 len, u8 *dst)
> >> {
> >> void __iomem *fifo = hw_ep->fifo;
> >> +
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_BF52x
> >> u8 epnum = hw_ep->epnum;
> >> u16 dma_reg = 0;
> >
> > Is this patch avoiding a warning about these variables being unused ?
> >
> > Would be nice to get this info to the patch body ;-)
>
> the subject already says that

the subject says:

"tweak musb_read_fifo() to avoid unused warnings"

it doesn't specify where are the warnings.

--
balbi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/