Re: [PATCH] x86: Don't pretend that non-framepointer stack tracesare reliable

[Ingo Molnar]

* Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> >From f460ce92e09770691855b98a904556e92d39ead9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 12:20:20 -0800
> Subject: [PATCH] x86: Don't pretend that non-framepointer stack traces are reliable
> 
> without frame pointers enabled, the x86 stack traces should not
> pretend to be reliable; instead they should just be what they are:
> unreliable.
> 
> The effect of this is that they have a ? printed in the stacktrace,
> to warn the reader that these entries are guesses rather than known
> based on more reliable information.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

applied to tip/x86/debug, thanks Arjan!

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/