Re: linux-next: Tree for February 10 (security/audit/ima)

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi Randy,

On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:55:12 -0800 Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > 
> > Dropped trees (temporarily):
> > 	audit (difficult conflicts)
> 
> Maybe this is fixed by the dropped audit tree?

The audit tree is Al Viro's (cc'd).  But I *think* everything in it has
been applied upstream.

> linux-next-20090210/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:111: error: implicit declaration of function 'security_audit_rule_match'
> linux-next-20090210/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:230: error: implicit declaration of function 'security_audit_rule_init'
> 
> when
> CONFIG_SECURITY=y
> CONFIG_AUDIT=n
> CONFIG_IMA=y
> CONFIG_IMA_AUDIT=y

This looks more like a security subsystem than audit to me?

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature