[PATCH] ARM: timeout will reach -1

From: Roel Kluin
Date: Wed Feb 11 2009 - 18:01:33 EST


With a postfix decrement the timeout will reach -1 rather than 0,
so the warning will not be issued.

Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@xxxxxxxxx>
---
diff --git a/sound/arm/aaci.c b/sound/arm/aaci.c
index 89096e8..772901e 100644
--- a/sound/arm/aaci.c
+++ b/sound/arm/aaci.c
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ static void aaci_ac97_write(struct snd_ac97 *ac97, unsigned short reg,
*/
do {
v = readl(aaci->base + AACI_SLFR);
- } while ((v & (SLFR_1TXB|SLFR_2TXB)) && timeout--);
+ } while ((v & (SLFR_1TXB|SLFR_2TXB)) && --timeout);

if (!timeout)
dev_err(&aaci->dev->dev,
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ static unsigned short aaci_ac97_read(struct snd_ac97 *ac97, unsigned short reg)
*/
do {
v = readl(aaci->base + AACI_SLFR);
- } while ((v & SLFR_1TXB) && timeout--);
+ } while ((v & SLFR_1TXB) && --timeout);

if (!timeout) {
dev_err(&aaci->dev->dev, "timeout on slot 1 TX busy\n");
@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ static unsigned short aaci_ac97_read(struct snd_ac97 *ac97, unsigned short reg)
do {
cond_resched();
v = readl(aaci->base + AACI_SLFR) & (SLFR_1RXV|SLFR_2RXV);
- } while ((v != (SLFR_1RXV|SLFR_2RXV)) && timeout--);
+ } while ((v != (SLFR_1RXV|SLFR_2RXV)) && --timeout);

if (!timeout) {
dev_err(&aaci->dev->dev, "timeout on RX valid\n");


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/