Re: git-send-email

[Cyrill Gorcunov]

[H. Peter Anvin - Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 10:13:16AM -0800]
| Junio C Hamano wrote:
| > 
| > I personally prefer the former, but as you hopefully all found out by now,
| > the choice between these two is just the matter of personal taste, and
| > there is no clear majority.
| > 
| 
| Quite on the contrary.  I think there is a clear majority in favor of
| --no-chain-reply-to.  Let me add my voice to that chorus, too.
| 
| 	-hpa
| 
| -- 
| H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
| I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.
| 

If that somehow matter -- I'm _for_ --no-chain-reply-to
by default too. It happens several times with me that
I missed this option even having in mind --no-chain-reply-to
behaviour expected.

On the other hand I think --no-chain-reply-to has much
sense if pathes being sent are not numbered in title.
But on LKML I can't remember even one mail-thread which was
not numbered :)

	- Cyrill -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/