Re: [PATCH] mmc: In mmc_power_up, use previously selected ocr ifavailable

[Andrew Morton]

On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 18:58:08 +0530
Balaji Rao <balajirrao@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> When mmc_power_up is called during unsafe resume, host->ocr should be
> used instead of host->ocr_avail.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Balaji Rao <balajirrao@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Andy Green <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Pierre Ossman <drzeus-mmc@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/core/core.c |    8 +++++++-
>  1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> index df6ce4a..3ad7f87 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> @@ -572,7 +572,13 @@ void mmc_set_timing(struct mmc_host *host, unsigned int timing)
>   */
>  static void mmc_power_up(struct mmc_host *host)
>  {
> -	int bit = fls(host->ocr_avail) - 1;
> +	int bit;
> +
> +	/* If ocr is set, we use it */
> +	if (host->ocr)
> +		bit = ffs(host->ocr) - 1;
> +	else
> +		bit = fls(host->ocr_avail) - 1;
>  
>  	host->ios.vdd = bit;
>  	if (mmc_host_is_spi(host)) {

What are the user-visible consequences of not having this patch in
their kernels?

In other words, what does this patch fix?

Please always include this information in changelogs.

See, this patch is applicable to 2.6.28, 2.6.27, 2.6.26, 2.6.25 and
probably earlier.  But I don't have a clue whether it should be applied
to those kernels, because you didn't tell me.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/