[PATCH] drm: Take mmap_sem up front to avoid lock order violations.

From: krh
Date: Wed Feb 18 2009 - 11:38:39 EST


From: Kristian HÃgsberg <krh@xxxxxxxxxx>

A number of GEM operations (and legacy drm ones) want to copy data to
or from userspace while holding the struct_mutex lock. However, the
fault handler calls us with the mmap_sem held and thus enforces the
opposite locking order. This patch downs the mmap_sem up front for
those operations that access userspace data under the struct_mutex
lock to ensure the locking order is consistent.

Signed-off-by: Kristian HÃgsberg <krh@xxxxxxxxxx>
---

Here's a different and simpler attempt to fix the locking order
problem. We can just down_read() the mmap_sem pre-emptively up-front,
and the locking order is respected. It's simpler than the
mutex_trylock() game, avoids introducing a new mutex.

(forgot to add lkml, resending)

cheers,
Kristian

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c | 6 +++++-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 20 +++++++++++++-------
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
index 81f1cff..d8b58d9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
@@ -642,9 +642,11 @@ static int i915_batchbuffer(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
sizeof(struct drm_clip_rect)))
return -EFAULT;

+ down_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
ret = i915_dispatch_batchbuffer(dev, batch);
mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
+ up_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);

if (sarea_priv)
sarea_priv->last_dispatch = READ_BREADCRUMB(dev_priv);
@@ -674,14 +676,16 @@ static int i915_cmdbuffer(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
return -EFAULT;
}

+ down_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
ret = i915_dispatch_cmdbuffer(dev, cmdbuf);
mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
+ up_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+
if (ret) {
DRM_ERROR("i915_dispatch_cmdbuffer failed\n");
return ret;
}
-
if (sarea_priv)
sarea_priv->last_dispatch = READ_BREADCRUMB(dev_priv);
return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index d9cd42f..3dd8b6e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -171,6 +171,7 @@ i915_gem_pread_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
return -EINVAL;
}

+ down_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);

ret = i915_gem_object_set_cpu_read_domain_range(obj, args->offset,
@@ -196,6 +197,7 @@ i915_gem_pread_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,

drm_gem_object_unreference(obj);
mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
+ up_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);

return 0;
}
@@ -264,7 +266,7 @@ i915_gem_gtt_pwrite(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_gem_object *obj,
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, user_data, remain))
return -EFAULT;

-
+ down_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
ret = i915_gem_object_pin(obj, 0);
if (ret) {
@@ -315,6 +317,7 @@ i915_gem_gtt_pwrite(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_gem_object *obj,
fail:
i915_gem_object_unpin(obj);
mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
+ up_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);

return ret;
}
@@ -328,6 +331,7 @@ i915_gem_shmem_pwrite(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_gem_object *obj,
loff_t offset;
ssize_t written;

+ down_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);

ret = i915_gem_object_set_to_cpu_domain(obj, 1);
@@ -350,6 +354,7 @@ i915_gem_shmem_pwrite(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_gem_object *obj,
}

mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
+ up_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);

return 0;
}
@@ -2473,22 +2478,21 @@ i915_gem_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
goto pre_mutex_err;
}

+ down_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);

i915_verify_inactive(dev, __FILE__, __LINE__);

if (dev_priv->mm.wedged) {
DRM_ERROR("Execbuf while wedged\n");
- mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
ret = -EIO;
- goto pre_mutex_err;
+ goto mutex_err;
}

if (dev_priv->mm.suspended) {
DRM_ERROR("Execbuf while VT-switched.\n");
- mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
ret = -EBUSY;
- goto pre_mutex_err;
+ goto mutex_err;
}

/* Look up object handles */
@@ -2641,8 +2645,6 @@ err:
for (i = 0; i < args->buffer_count; i++)
drm_gem_object_unreference(object_list[i]);

- mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
-
if (!ret) {
/* Copy the new buffer offsets back to the user's exec list. */
ret = copy_to_user((struct drm_i915_relocation_entry __user *)
@@ -2655,6 +2657,10 @@ err:
args->buffer_count, ret);
}

+mutex_err:
+ mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
+ up_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+
pre_mutex_err:
drm_free(object_list, sizeof(*object_list) * args->buffer_count,
DRM_MEM_DRIVER);
--
1.6.1.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/