Re: [rtc-linux] [PATCH/RFC 0/5] Generic RTC class driver

[David Woodhouse]

On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 13:34 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >    my opinion on this kind of stuff is that I want to avoid the layering
> >  of implementations under the rtc subsystem. I'd rather prefer that each
> >  rtc device had its own driver. 
> >  
> >   I've made error in the past, by accepting such kind of drivers, and
> >  would like to avoid that it happens again.
> 
> So you want us to kill the ppc_md.[gs]et_rtc_time() [ppc], mach_hwclk() [m68k],
> mach_gettod() [m68knommu] (and probably a few other) abstractions, and move all
> RTC code out of arch/ into seperate drivers under drivers/rtc/ instead?

That's the ideal... although did we get NTP sync working again yet?

The rtc-ppc driver was intended as a short-term workaround so that we
can enable the generic RTC class (which was required for PA Semi
Electra, iirc), and still have stuff work on other platforms.

-- 
David Woodhouse                            Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@xxxxxxxxx                              Intel Corporation

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/