Re: ATA support for 4k sector size

[david]

On Wed, 25 Feb 2009, Martin K. Petersen wrote:

> > > > > > "hpa" == H Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > > The two patches following this add support for drives which have
> > > sector sizes other than 512 bytes.  I haven't been able to test this
> > > as I don't have the hardware.
>
> hpa> What sector size do we report to user space for this?  I'm asking
> hpa> because logical sector size is visible in most partition formats.
>
> There are several flavors of drives we have to deal with:
>
> 512-byte logical / 512-byte hardware (current)
> 512-byte logical / 4096-byte hardware (ATA, doing read-modify-write)
> 4096-byte logical / 4096-byte hardware (SCSI initially, ATA later)

add to this good support for SSDs

?? logical / 128K hardware

or similar.

David Lang

> Because of 63-sector legacy problems a bunch of ATA vendors will
> initially ship 512/4096 drives that are not naturally aligned.
> I.e. logical sector 63 will be aligned on a 4KB hardware sector
> boundary to overcome the misaligned default partitioning.
>
> I have been working on some alignment patches the last week.  They hook
> into the stuff Matthew has been doing in libata and I'll post them
> shortly.
>
> For each block device you'll get a hardware sector size exposed as well
> as whether the device (partition) is naturally aligned or not.  This
> works for both ATA and SCSI devices.
>
> I'll defer to people like yourself for how this needs to work wrt. boot
> loaders and creating partition tables.  I'm CC:ing Eric Sandeen because
> he's also looking at this...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/