Re: [PATCH v2] bonding: move IPv6 support into a separate kernel module

[Chuck Lever]

On Feb 26, 2009, at Feb 26, 2009, 3:01 PM, Brian Haley wrote:
> Chuck Lever wrote:
> > > I think changing ipv6 to support a disable_ipv6 module parameter  
> > > like Vlad suggested would work, as long as we're not worried about  
> > > someone opening an AF_INET6 socket - even if they do they won't  
> > > get anywhere.
> > In this case, if IPV6ONLY is set on an AF_INET6 listener, it should  
> > still get AF_INET traffic, correct?
>
> No, it should get nothing, and a send should get ENETUNREACH.

Sorry, I got my logic backwards.  If IPV6ONLY is intentionally cleared  
on an AF_INET6 socket, it should still be able to handle AF_INET  
traffic.

--
Chuck Lever
chuck[dot]lever[at]oracle[dot]com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/