Re: [RFD] Automatic suspend

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!

> > > Then, the decision making logic will be able to use /sys/power/sleep whenever
> > > it wishes to and the kernel will be able to refuse to suspend if it's not
> > > desirable at the moment.
> > >
> > > It seems to be flexible enough to me.
> > 
> > This seems flexible enough to avoid race conditions, but it forces the
> > user space power manager to poll when the kernel refuse suspend.
> 
> And if the kernel is supposed to start automatic suspend, it has to monitor
> all of the wakelocks.  IMO, it's better to allow the power manager to poll the
> kernel if it refuses to suspend.

polling is evil -- it keeps CPU wake up => wastes power.

Wakelocks done right are single atomic_t... and if you set it to 0,
you just unblock "sleeper" thread or something. Zero polling and very
simple...
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/