Re: [PATCH RFC] x86: add brk allocation for very, very early allocations

[Jeremy Fitzhardinge]

H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>   
> > unsigned int boot_cpu_id __read_mostly;
> > +__initdata unsigned long _brk_start, _brk_end;
> >
> >     
>
> Better yet, initialize _brk_start and _brk_end statically:
>
> extern const char _end[];
> __initdata unsigned long _brk_start = (unsigned long)&_end;
> __initdata unsigned long _brk_end   = (unsigned long)&_end;
>
> That way it's available from the first instruction, and we can fully
> remove the x86-32 init_pg_tables_end and replace it with _brk_end (thus
> putting the initial page tables in the brk.)

Yes.  It doesn't work for Xen (the domain builder puts the initrd and 
Xen-built pagetable immediately after the kernel's bss), but its no 
problem to move the brk in that case.

   J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/