Re: [PATCH] xen: core dom0 support

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Sat Feb 28 2009 - 02:21:20 EST



* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> [...] At the moment its all running on massive out-of-tree
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> patches, which doesn't make anyone happy. It's best that it
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> be in the mainline kernel. You know, like we argue for
> everything else.
>
>> In three years time, will we regret having merged this?
>
> Its a pretty minor amount of extra stuff on top of what's been
> added over the last 3 years, so I don't think it's going to
> tip the scales on its own. I wouldn't be comfortable in
> trying to merge something that's very intrusive.

Hm, how can the same code that you call "massive out-of-tree
patches which doesn't make anyone happy" in an out of tree
context suddenly become non-intrusive "minor amount of extra
stuff" in an upstream context?

I wish the upstream kernel was able to do such magic, but i'm
afraid it is not.

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/