Re: [patch 2.6.29-rc6+misc] MMC: regulator utilities

[David Brownell]

On Monday 02 March 2009, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> > > > +int mmc_regulator_set_ocr(struct mmc_host *host, struct regulator *supply)
> > > > +{
> > > 
> > > Why not pass the vdd directly? Saves a few dereferences if nothing else.
> > 
> > This call syntax is simpler, which is usually a win.
> > Passing a third parameter would create fault paths
> > of the "pass *wrong* parameter" flavor.
> > 
> > In terms of object code, when I've looked at such things
> > the dereferences generally cost the same as a ref to a
> > parameter, but passing an extra parameter isn't free.
> > 
> 
> I couldn't see host being used in there, so I was thinking more of a
> replacement, not an addition.

Oh, I see.  That'd make sense.  Just pass host->ios.vdd.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/