Re: [PATCH] Text Edit Lock - Architecture Independent Code

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Mon Mar 02 2009 - 19:33:44 EST



* Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> +/*
> + * Take and release the kernel text modification lock, used for code patching.
> + * Users of this lock can sleep.
> + */
> +extern void kernel_text_lock(void);
> +extern void kernel_text_unlock(void);

Locking APIs with hidden semantics are very ugly. Remember
lock_kernel()?

> +/*
> + * mutex protecting text section modification (dynamic code patching).
> + * some users need to sleep (allocating memory...) while they hold this lock.
> + */
> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(text_mutex);

Please update those sites to do an explicit:

mutex_lock(&text_mutex);

instead.

That way we save a function call, and we'll also see exactly
what type of lock is being taken, etc.

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/