Re: [x86-tip] overflow in relocation type 11 val 39ffdd0e8690

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Fri Mar 06 2009 - 06:18:46 EST



* Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 22:25 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >> * Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On latest tip I am getting:
> >>>
> >>> [ 124.169475] overflow in relocation type 11 val 39ffdd0e8690
> >>> [ 124.169508] `msr_debug' likely not compiled with -mcmodel=kernel
> >>> [ 146.582299] overflow in relocation type 11 val 39ffdd0e8690
> >>> [ 146.582299] `msr_debug' likely not compiled with -mcmodel=kernel
> >>> [ 836.653168] overflow in relocation type 11 val 39ffdd0e8690
> >>> [ 836.653201] `msr_debug' likely not compiled with -mcmodel=kernel
> >>>
> >>> But 1d10914bf2c8 was working fine.
> >
> > No it is also not fine :( for percpu.
> >
> >> That's a linker bug - Tejun Cc:-ed.
> >>
> >
> > Problem is basically with 64 bit percpu on 32 bit it is OK. Ahh, Here is
> > the solution:
> >
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/3/3/129
> >
> > because of commit 8ac83757149 of Tejun Heo.
>
> Yeah, patchset almost ready. Please wait a bit more.
>
> Thanks.

Latest tip:master should have your fixes for modules and kernel
text getting farther than ~2GB apart from each other on 64-bit.

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/